|
OR OUR FIRST INVESTIGATION OF GEORGE W. BUSH, FEBRUARY 2000, SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE DOSSIER NO. 00000001! |
|
|
"We still need to pay $153 for this stinking logo. Start investigating!" - Management
The bare facts of the matter are well-known by now. Someone in the Bush campaign sent a box of materials to the Gore campaign. The materials related in some way to George W. Bush's preparations for the debates with Al Gore. The Gore campaign then turned these items over to the FBI. Then the FBI, overworked and unable to get to the case before the election, farmed out the work to our investigative team. What follows is a report of our investigation, such as it was.
September
25,
2000 Report
Special
Investigative Dossier No 00000002:
"Mole
Molests Bush Campaign?
or
what we like to call...
The Case
of the Delivered Debate Dealies"
What
we hope to find: evidence of great wrongdoing

Very Item
That Sparked This Most Current of Investigations,
Demanding
Re-Use of Negative Spin Investigative Logo Above and
Newest
Pursuit of Actual Investigation to Recoup Expense
of Said Logo
Special
Thanks to the Overworked FBI for Your Trust
This Box
Will Subsequently Be Referred to (maybe)
as
"The Box" (technically "The Provoking Article #00000002")
The
Contents have no technical name beyond The Contents,
but if
they did have a technical name it would have
to be
"The Contents of The Provoking Article #00000002".
FACTS &
FINDINGS OF THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE GROUP;
POINTS
FROM OFFICIAL ROUNDTABLE INVESTIGATION OF "THE PROVOKING ARTICLE":
Chairman Polson opened this session of the special investigative group. Speaking from a prepared text, he lead in voluntary prayer, praying something about patience and how his heart was darkened. We reminded him this wasn't a high school football game, and he immediately retracted his remarks. He told us he expected a "good investigation," and lambasted several of the smaller members of the team, a painful reminder of his troubles at home.
Photos of The Provoking Article were distributed.
Quiet study time was allowed and time for personal thought on photos of The Provoking Article.
Vice Chair Klein looked around the table to give someone the floor. Comments were slow in coming, but someone finally asked why we would study a photo when the actual Provoking Article was in the room.
Finally the investigation began in earnest. No clues noted on exterior of the box.

In opening the box, two videotapes fell out.
Investigation was immediately stymied by lack of VCR.
Chairman Polson was heard muttering, "How could she do this to me?"
Ordinary videocassette marked "Survivor episodes" was noted.
Videocassette called "Dimbo in Debate Land" was noted. Conclusions were drawn from thorough examination of the case:
The creature pictured on the case was unfamiliar to us.
No other helpful information could be ascertained as to what the video's contents were.
Vice-chairman alerted us to what was next in The Provoking Article. Every eye glanced from the several directions, that is each eye glanced from where it was to the place where The Box was.
Here
the investigation
seemed to be getting down to the other items found within the box.
But we were suddenly stopped as there was some discussion on how
ethical it would be to ignore a note that clearly said, "THIS
STUFF IS TOP SECRET!!!"
Chairman Polson suddenly karate-chopped the air, muttering, "Under my own roof?"
It was determined the note referred only to the contents of the notebook and not to the contents of the Provoking Article. And, anyway, it was a note to "SELF" and not us.
Quite a few papers in the box. Borrrrrring! Looked like just the usual policy papers from briefings. Also some seemed to detail "What Bush Tells the Public" and "What He Actually Intends to Do," stuff like that. There were some documents about how they could put a mole in the Gore camp, how they knew certain ones who would do it for a price. Just glancing through here: "KR - It could be done, we could do it." "KH - But it'd take a lot of money, maybe a million." "GWB - A million? We could get a million. I know where we could get it. But [expletive deleted], it'd be wrong." "KR - Let's hold off on it." "GWB - OK, let's hold off, but keep it in mind." Just boring stuff like that.
A children's book of "Smokey the Bear." Inside a section was underlined: "Never burn grass, brush, or trash on windy days. When they do burn it, they should have plenty of help." Apparently to be used in debate to criticize Administration's handling of western fires.
Miscellaneous other books: Book of Great Quotations, with several Mark Twain quotes underlined, one Lloyd Bentzen quote circled with "BEWARE" in the margin; Scoutmasters Book, with section marked on various ways of tying a guy to a fence (thought to be a reference to Wyoming and Dick Cheney somehow.)
Chairman Polson seemed slightly out of touch with the rest of the group, shouting, "Oh! Steve is your big lover boy!?"

Pictured here is an interesting item we found in The Provoking Article: A special miniature edition of the old Big Chief tablet, just a little bigger than a quarter! From the looks of the inside, Gov. Bush was working on improving his vocabulary, and was already up to words that would fit on these tiny pages.
The group took a break. It seemed the investigation might go to 2 p.m. A few of us went to the candy machine and were very very crabby about busting our aching humps.
Chairman Polson, appearing to be in a bad mood and wanting to get home, dismissed us for the day. We followed him, as it seemed like there might be something more interesting than this cusséd Provoking Article to see at his house!
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS:
No
evidence of wrongdoing found in the Gore camp.
Note
to George W. Bush:
If you
want your box of crap back, send money and lots of it. Like $153! Yes,
it'd be wrong,
but it could be done;
you
could do it.
|
COMMITTEE |
|
Going in
|
Governor Bush: Al Gore is a
master debater. You are going to have to be on your toes at all times
to keep up with him. Remember, he is going to challenge every
statement you make, because his intention is always to keep you
unbalanced and on the defensive.
We've learned certain things
about his style and tactics from previous debates. When he debated
Ross Perot he basically left the old bird sitting in a warm pile of
his own waste. Which for all its humorous qualities, understandably
didn't "sit well" with Perot. When he was with Perot,
though, recall how he kept stepping on Perot's lines. Gore knew this
would rattle his opponent, while making himself look simply eager to
share facts and on top of the issues. Perot then had to object about
being interrupted, which was exactly what Gore intended as the means
of taking away his balance. After Gore was done, the giant sucking
sound Perot heard was his own feeble lungs trying to catch a final
life breath!
In the '92 debate with Dan
Quayle, Quayle thought things might go his way. He was completely on
his guard against any kind of Bentzen remark, having prepared a
notecard that read simply, "OH YEAH?!" But Gore was very
kind to Quayle, exactly what Quayle wasn't prepared for. The net
effect was that Quayle seemed too aggressive; his expectations were
all screwed up and it showed. This lent itself to Gore's advantage.
And with the quick knock-out drops in Quayle's glass of water, the
debate was Al Gore's to lose...which he didn't. |

George
W. Bush Is Guilty-as-Sin of Something!
We
just need to keep looking!
|
Buy a book! Think of a conspiracy and read about it! Maybe Amazon.com is trying to hide something from you!
If Bush can't take care of his campaign's security, ©2000 NegativeSpin.com
|